Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: graphics cards recommendations
- To: <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Re: tlug: graphics cards recommendations
- From: "Micheal E Cooper" <mecooper@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 21:06:18 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"
- References: <Pine.LNX.3.96LJ1.1b7.1000402111410.9760A-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug
Wonderful! I think I saw a G400 at the Yamada Denki that just opened in Hyuga City, about 30 minutes south of here. Since it become the year 2000, even northern Miyazaki has started to see motherboards and computer parts in electronics stores. Thank you. As a further question to this... is AGP okay with this G400? The Red Hat HCL states that "No card should be considered to be AGP or VLB unless the listing specifies it.", but I did not see AGP on the list. Does this mean that I should use a PCI card if I want good Linux support? ----- Original Message ----- From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com> To: <tlug@example.com> Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2000 11:26 AM Subject: Re: tlug: graphics cards recommendations | On Sun, 2 Apr 2000, Micheal E Cooper wrote: | | > window, it is larger than the viewable area of my screen. So can anyone | > recommend a graphics card for Linux that is not only compatible but also | > enables full use of the card's capabilities? | | I'm very happy with the Matrox Millenium G400. This is the second | Matrox card I've used (the other was a Millenium II) and they have both | been great. It should be a rule of thumb to not buy no-name video | cards, because saving a little money there is not worth it for the | potential problems. Asus makes good motherboards, but their video cards | are no-name. This is an area where you should really stick to major | brands that are on the HCL for the version of X that you have. Also, | it's a good idea to check compatibility with not just the vendor's site, | but on the actual XFree86 HCL. | | The whole problem you've had points up exactly why I think graphical | installers are bad, and wish vendors were not moving in that direction: | if the installer has a problem with your graphics card, you're stuck, | even if it would be supported by X once you got it installed. My dad | had this same problem with a no-name card he had. A G400 made a nice | cure, if the installer had been properly engineered to have a fallback | to the old-style Red Hat installer, this would not have been an issue. | | Jonathan | | -------------------------------------------------------------------- | Next Nomikai Meeting: April 20 (Thu) Linux Conference 2000 Spring Ed. | Next Technical Meeting: May 13 (Sat) 13:30 Temple University Japan | * Topic: TBD | -------------------------------------------------------------------- | more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp Sponsor: Global Online Japan | -------------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai Meeting: April 20 (Thu) Linux Conference 2000 Spring Ed. Next Technical Meeting: May 13 (Sat) 13:30 Temple University Japan * Topic: TBD -------------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp Sponsor: Global Online Japan
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: graphics cards recommendations
- From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>
- Re: tlug: graphics cards recommendations
- From: "Jack Morgan" <yojack@example.com>
- References:
- Re: tlug: graphics cards recommendations
- From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: graphics cards recommendations
- Next by Date: RE: tlug: Samba and FAT32(VFAT) with Japanese file names
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: graphics cards recommendations
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: graphics cards recommendations
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links