Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Other free imnput besides WNN?
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Other free imnput besides WNN?
- From: Mike Fabian <mfabian@example.com>
- Date: 24 Aug 2000 18:31:00 +0200
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: Marc Christensen's message of "Thu, 24 Aug 2000 10:17:17 -0600 (MDT)"
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10008241014370.31732-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: mfabian@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <YWB4PD.A.lTF._8Up5@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- Sender: mfabian@example.com
- User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Capitol Reef)
Marc Christensen <marc@example.com> writes: > There is a little concern on the part of a friend of mine over the > security of WNN. I am not familiar with what his concerns are, however I > was wondering if there is a replacement input method that is free There is Canna: http://www.nec.co.jp/japanese/product/computer/soft/canna/ ftp://ftp.nec.co.jp/pub/Canna/Canna35/Canna35b2.tar.gz It is free software. > and would be widely accepted by the Japanese Linux community. Whether it is widely accepted, I don't know. RedHat 6.2J uses it. > What are your oppinions on this? I used Wnn4 previously and currently I am using mainly Canna. From the user point of view there doesn't seem to be much difference. Both work reasonably well. -- Mike Fabian <mfabian@example.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Other free imnput besides WNN?
- From: SL Baur <steve@example.com>
- References:
- Other free imnput besides WNN?
- From: Marc Christensen <marc@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Other free imnput besides WNN?
- Next by Date: Re: Other free imnput besides WNN?
- Prev by thread: Other free imnput besides WNN?
- Next by thread: Re: Other free imnput besides WNN?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links