Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Beavis is back and I wanna show him a raw IP dump
- To: tlug <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Re: Beavis is back and I wanna show him a raw IP dump
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 02:26:04 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10009060953590.19125-100000@example.com>
- References: <14774.5234.887615.132988@example.com><Pine.GSO.4.05.10009060953590.19125-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <htMPO.A.mGC.4Cot5@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
Thanks to Chris, Scott, and Jonathan (so far) for all the advice. >>>>> "Scott" == Scott M Stone <sstone@example.com> writes: Scott> 1) a ton of collisions on one or both of the two Scott> segments on either side of the router Nope; there's only one side to the tests I'm running (I delete the route for localnet). I don't see why this would be more true going host1 <--> router <--> host2 than going host1 <--> host2. Ifconfig output shows very few collisions (7 vs 180,000 packets), even after FTPing the Mozilla source across that router. Of course I get nearly 10 Mbps if I enable the localnet routes. Scott> 2) faulty cabling somewhere Very possible, the wiring is getting old (going on 8 years now). 3) faulty router Beavis says not. Scott> Tell Beavis to replace the router, and make sure there's Scott> switches on both sides of it, not hubs. Not likely. Where do you think I work, someplace where budgets are for getting work done? "Here, Mr. Veedle, work is the excuse for getting budgets." We're working on this, but I don't call the netadmins "Beavis" for no reason. It really truly looks like I'm going to have to prove that it's their problem before I'll get any action. Scott> show him the ifconfig output with all of the errors. Scott> "netstat -i" helps, What's in netstat -i that isn't in ifconfig? It just looks more compressed, to me. Anyway, I've done this. This doesn't convince anyone who matters, although I sure think it should. My local tech staff are sympathetic, but they don't "own" the routers. Apparently they have had a very bad time of it trying to get the computer center to get their act together, and really don't want to go through the hassle without a lot of data. So I would really like to get my hands on some broken packets.... -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Beavis is back and I wanna show him a raw IP dump
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- References:
- Beavis is back and I wanna show him a raw IP dump
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Re: Beavis is back and I wanna show him a raw IP dump
- From: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Beavis is back and I wanna show him a raw IP dump
- Next by Date: Re: GNU-Linux vs Linux naming [was RE: LAM/MPI Parallel processing]
- Prev by thread: Re: Beavis is back and I wanna show him a raw IP dump
- Next by thread: Re: Beavis is back and I wanna show him a raw IP dump
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links