Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]ethner card problem
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: ethner card problem
- From: "Marcus O.C. Metzler" <mocm@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 10:55:49 +0200 (CEST)
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <E13avlw-00044T-00@example.com>
- References: <E13avlw-00044T-00@example.com>
- Reply-To: <mocm@example.com>
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <BVUK5C.A.UWG.Atdx5@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
ulrike@example.com writes: > I bought an ethernetcard, a Corega Ether PCC-T, and although it had a little > penguin on the box I am having difficultes with getting it recognized. In fact, > yesterday cardinfo claimed it was some kind of other ethernetcard, forgot the > name, today it says it is "Anonymous Memory". Does that mean it is broken now? > > Another thing I don't quite understand is the information on the > corega-hompepage regarding setting this thing up: > > http://www.corega.co.jp/technical/pc-unixl1.htm > > On the one hand they write: > > Linux Version > Linux 2.2.9(Slackware3.6) + pcmcia-cs-3.0.10 > > PC > Panasonic Let's note A4 > > $BHw9M(B > pcmcia-cs-3.0.10 $B$h$j(Bcorega Ether PCC-T $B$,@example.com<0%5%]!<%H$5$l$^$7$?!#(B > /etc/pcmcia/config$B$X$NDI2C$OI,MW$"$j$^$;$s!#(B > > On the other hand a little further down: > > $BHw9M(B > pcmcia-cs-3.0.10 /etc/pcmcia/config.opts$B%U%!%$%k$X2<5-$rDI2C(B > module "pcnet_cs" opts "use_shmem=0" > > (Now I just hope the Japanese text get's through...) > > So does that mean it also depends on the hardware? Or is this just a misprint, > because none of the examples above that line are using pcmcia-cs 3.0.10? > > I have pcmcia-cs 3.1.8-14, so this card should be supported withouth any > tweaking, shouldn't it according to this text? > > Just checked /etc/pcmcia/config and it has the card listed. > > But since cardmanager now says "Anonymous Memory" that means the problem might > be at the moment that the card is broken? But when it was recognized as some > other type of ethernet card it was still ok maybe, or a problem of a too old > version of pcmcia-cs? I have updated since then. But what could have broken the > card? What do you get for "cardctl ident"? Is the version or manufacturer id in the config file? Try loading pcnet_cs by hand and look what kind of error messages you get. Marcus --------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Marcus Metzler mocm@example.com http://www.metzlerbros.de mocm@example.com http://www.convergence.de Convergence Integrated Media GmbH Rosenthaler Str. 51 D-10178 Berlin ---------------------------------------------------------------------
- References:
- ethner card problem
- From: ulrike@example.com
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: ethner card problem
- Next by Date: Re: Network time protocol
- Prev by thread: ethner card problem
- Next by thread: Re: ethner card problem
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links