Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: hardware doctors!
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: hardware doctors!
- From: Jonathan Byrne <j-byrne@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 17:00:24 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <E13be8u-0006Nx-00@example.com>; from shimpei@example.com on Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 04:18:08PM +0900
- References: <E13be8u-0006Nx-00@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <isYvUC.A.Py.8DHy5@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
shimpei@example.com (shimpei@example.com) wrote: > So what *do* you recommend? I need a laptop hard disk on the double--my Both for our personal use and for use in servers and workstations, IBM is our brand of choice. "I've never had one fail on me" is junk testimony because of small samples (I have a 5 year old WD Caviar that is the soul of reliability - YMMV), but we have many IBM drives in service and are very happy with price, performance, and reliability. Plus, even if you have had a disk fail, that means nothing. A certain percentage of every brand fails. That's why there's an MTBF spec. Now, if everyone you know has had a disk from maker X fail (especially if they were all recent failiures), that is cause for caution (or concern, if you have one yourself). Jonathan Byrne <j-byrne@example.com> Engineering Division Exodus Communications K.K. http://www.exodus.co.jp/ Tel: +81 3-5334-1700 Fax: +81 3-5334-1702 Direct: +81 3-5334-1756
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: hardware doctors!
- From: Sajjad Zaidi <sajjad@example.com>
- References:
- Re: hardware doctors!
- From: shimpei@example.com
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: hardware doctors!
- Next by Date: Re: hardware doctors!
- Prev by thread: Re: hardware doctors!
- Next by thread: Re: hardware doctors!
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links