Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Linux/Mozilla related Short-Term Contract
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Linux/Mozilla related Short-Term Contract
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 19:11:12 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <E13gNoT-0000h1-00@example.com>
- References: <E13gNoT-0000h1-00@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <G4Akv.A._vH.GRb25@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
>>>>> "Shimpei" == Shimpei Yamashita <shimpei@example.com> writes: Shimpei> But really, a lot of the blame in bad l10n by Japanese Shimpei> patchers can be laid at the feet of the original Shimpei> programmers who conveniently assumed byte=char. It takes Shimpei> a lot of effort to fix that sort of an assumption. True, but what was the alternative? Wide chars were prohibitively expensive for everyone for whom they weren't necessary 20 years ago. Those "original programmers" spent as much sweat working around platform limitations (including design idiocies) as Japanese programmers do today dealing with the byte=char assumption. And unlike the Y2K fiasco, non-Asians (in practice until a very few years ago, non-Japanese) can't design or debug systems intended to handle large character sets. They don't know what the needs are. Shimpei> It also doesn't help that most non-Asian programmers Shimpei> assume that "everybody speaks English" and consider Shimpei> acceptable multibyte support Somebody Else's Problem. Well, if "acceptable" means handling Shift-JIS, I think so too! Not my problem.... :-) You should remember Drepper's talk well. People still want glibc to handle Shift JIS internally! And the same stuff came up in Yokohama last year in the Samba sessions. This is all insane. Shimpei> Well, whatever. The end result is still sucky Japanese Shimpei> support on Linux that keeps rotting on the vine because Shimpei> the maintainer doesn't want to look at them. Which is the nub of the matter. Whether Japanese like it or not, to have much influence on design decisions, they have to get to be core developers. That means getting patches accepted, which means writing patches that don't stomp on the core team's goals. Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to be joshiki around L10N projects. Shimpei> which, maybe tonight I'll bother to figure out why the Shimpei> Japanized version of file(1) on Kondara thinks all JPEG Shimpei> files are "SJIS text files".... omigawd. -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."
- References:
- Re: Linux/Mozilla related Short-Term Contract
- From: shimpei@example.com
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: RE: Linux/Mozilla related Short-Term Contract
- Next by Date: RE: Linux/Mozilla related Short-Term Contract
- Prev by thread: Re: Linux/Mozilla related Short-Term Contract
- Next by thread: Self extracting archive
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links