Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Open Source
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Open Source
- From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 11:12:49 +0100
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <FOEBIKDLMFBGOKGGBGDEOEGACGAA.jshore@example.com>; from jshore@example.com on Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 07:13:21PM +0900
- References: <20001005103712.A29311@example.com> <FOEBIKDLMFBGOKGGBGDEOEGACGAA.jshore@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <GvIZ8.A.wwD.WgF35@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- Sender: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 07:13:21PM +0900, Jonathan Shore wrote: > I can tell you that when these projects moved from a small geographical > group to a somewhat larger distributed group the project became much more > difficult in the following areas: > > * coordinating source control, branching, merging, etc > * keeping a common vision and priorities > * managing the time to get aspects of the source frozen > * more thorough documentation > * control > > Ultimately the time to delivery for any release slowed down dramatically > because of these issues. Worked fine for me. Any reflection on management ability, do you think? -- Don't get suckered in by the comments -- they can be terribly misleading. Debug only code. -- Dave Storer
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Open Source
- From: "Jonathan Shore" <jshore@example.com>
- References:
- Re: Open Source
- From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- RE: Open Source
- From: "Jonathan Shore" <jshore@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [Group Etiquette]
- Next by Date: RE: Open Source
- Prev by thread: RE: Open Source
- Next by thread: RE: Open Source
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links