Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- From: YAMAGATA Hiroo <hiyori13@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 21:02:14 +0900
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
- In-Reply-To: <001701c04c9f$af88e7f0$0201a8c0@example.com>
- References: <4.2.0.58.J.20001112182916.029b2c40@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <_529EB.A.2d.eeoD6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
At 20:57 00/11/12 +0900, you wrote: >Also, as Yamagata-san mentioned, I am VERY happy with the ports system, >especially as compared to the RedHat rpm system. One of the most frustrating >things I had dealt with using RH was broken dependencies. Oh, about this point. BSDs have ports (which patch and compile things from source) and packages (binaries). They are both supposed to take care of dependencies, but all of these stuff are only as good as the person who assembles them. There ARE broken dependencies in these stuff, too. I had a lot of trouble before finding out that XEmacs needs gettext. So don't be OVER confident...
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- References:
- Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- From: YAMAGATA Hiroo <hiyori13@example.com>
- Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- From: "shawn" <shawn@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- Next by Date: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- Prev by thread: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- Next by thread: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links