Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: the future of Linu(s/x)
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: the future of Linu(s/x)
- From: Darren Cook <darrenj@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:23:42 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
- References: <LOBBJBJBEAMOCDPLPEFCCEBCDIAA.michael-engel@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <eaVG0B.A._lC.XIOd6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
> http://www.techweb.com/wire/story/TWB20010126S0013 -------------- Some Linux solution providers view the constantly evolving process of the posting of Linux libraries, patches, and updates to the Internet as inefficient and cumbersome ... "I don't believe open source works well for commercial companies because they can't control schedules," -------------- I think the companies are forgetting they can't control schedules for software development. Open source has little to do with it. They also seem to be forgetting they're free to fork the kernel development. I'm sure Redhat would use IBM's or Compaq's linux kernel if it was better than the official linus one. Darren
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: the future of Linu(s/x)
- From: "Jonathan Shore" <jshore@example.com>
- Re: the future of Linu(s/x)
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- References:
- the future of Linu(s/x)
- From: "Michael Engel" <michael-engel@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: the future of Linu(s/x)
- Next by Date: RE: the future of Linu(s/x)
- Prev by thread: the future of Linu(s/x)
- Next by thread: RE: the future of Linu(s/x)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links