Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: gcc upgrade
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: gcc upgrade
- From: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 01:53:51 -0800 (PST)
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <14966.34336.933295.609700@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <vFpMGD.A.a8E.w-od6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Viktor Pavlenko wrote: > Hi all, > > just compiled and installed gcc-2.95.2, under /usr/local. It seems to > work. > > Now, I have egcs-1.1.2-30 and egcs-c++-1.1.2-30 rpm packages as well > as dynamic C++ libraries (which don't belong to any package) already > installed. It's a RH 6.2 system. > > I wonder if I would break anything now by unistalling the two egcs > packages? Is it enough to have /usr/local/bin in the PATH and > /usr/local/lib in ld path to switch compilers? > > I know that the best way to find out is to try, but here I feel that > to ask is better :) theoretically the RPMs shouldn't own anything in /usr/local - check with "rpm -ql egcs | grep local". As long as they don't, you can safely remove them without affecting the compiler that you installed under /usr/local. -------------------------- Scott M. Stone <sstone@example.com> Cisco Certified Network Associate, Sun Solaris Certified Systems Administrator UNIX Systems and Network Engineer Taos - The SysAdmin Company
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc upgrade
- From: Jake Morrison <jacob.morrison@example.com>
- References:
- gcc upgrade
- From: Viktor Pavlenko <vp@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: shell state of mind
- Next by Date: *.la and *.a
- Prev by thread: gcc upgrade
- Next by thread: Re: gcc upgrade
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links