Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: about ADSL
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: about ADSL
- From: Tobias Diedrich <ranma@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 03:05:00 +0100 (CET)
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <20010223095727.A29371@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <vU1ySB.A.SmH.WVcl6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
Uva Coder wrote: > > What if the DSL-Modem uses PPPoE encapsulation ? > > PPPoE may protect against some DOS attacks, but is still vulnerable. > See RFC2515 Section 9 Security Concerns for more info. You can > find the RFC at http://ww.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2516.html . Well, I didn't mean it that way I think. Basically my PCs are connected to a switch, as well as the DSL Modem. The Modem uses PPPoE encapsulation for the Internet Connection. So AFAIK it should not be possible to "Break out" of the P2P-Connection between Router and Modem. The router has one Network card and is acting as a firewall (basically allowing all outgoing traffic from local net to ppp0 but not allowing incoming connections from ppp0) The Security Notes in the RFC seem to concern only DOS-Attacks from me to the Access Concentrator... I meant whether it is possible to Somehow attacking one of my PCs directly (circumventing the firewall, because the Modem is physically connected to all other PCs via the switch). -- Tobias
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: about ADSL
- From: Uva Coder <uvacoder@example.com>
- References:
- Re: about ADSL
- From: Uva Coder <uvacoder@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: about ADSL
- Next by Date: Re: about ADSL
- Prev by thread: Re: about ADSL
- Next by thread: Re: about ADSL
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links