Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [despammed] Re: Linux-to-Linux copying?
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: [despammed] Re: Linux-to-Linux copying?
- From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:53:36 +0000
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <20010321074653.D32067@example.com>; from neil@example.com on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 07:46:53AM +0000
- References: <20010316171642.A12690@example.com> <XFMail.20010316084609.s-luppescu@example.com> <15032.9760.789417.326241@example.com> <20010321131116.B26322@example.com> <20010321074653.D32067@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <xrXrHD.A.H6C.aENu6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- Sender: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 07:46:53AM +0000, Neil Booth wrote: > Christopher SEKIYA wrote:- > > ... its version number is PI to how many places? Five? > I think so, but the last time it was bumped was 1992 IIRC. Although it looks like it's going to have to go up again... Subject: TeX.web bug in \xleaders resulting in a missing leader box The current and older versions of TeX.web (including TeX versions before 2.6!) have a bug in the routines dealing with leaders. Example 1. The bug is triggered by a simple example as the following Plain TeX input a\xleaders\hbox to 3pt{\hss .\hss}\hskip 45pt\relax b\bye Whereas one expects that there will be 15 dots---each leader box has a width of 3pt and is set in a glue of width 45pt---, only 14 dots are shown. Instead of the 15th dot there is unwanted white space between the 14th dot and the letter ``b''. This bug was introduced by the change of (cf. ``tex82.bug'') 255. Bug in \xleader computations (found by FY, August 18) [1983] in TeX version 1.0 (sic!) where |lx|, the space between leader boxes was introduced without changing the termination condition of the while loop in section 626. Unfortunately, Don only looks at bug reports every four years these days, so it won't get fixed until next year. -- Um. There is no David conspiracy. Definitely not. No Kate conspiracy either. No. No, there is definitely not any sort of David conspiracy, and we are definitely *not* in league with the Kate conspiracy. Who doesn't exist. And nor does the David conspiracy. No. No conspiracies here. - Thorfinn, ASR
- References:
- Re: [despammed] Re: Linux-to-Linux copying?
- From: Christopher SEKIYA <wileyc@example.com>
- Re: [despammed] Re: Linux-to-Linux copying?
- From: s-luppescu@example.com
- Re: [despammed] Re: Linux-to-Linux copying?
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Re: [despammed] Re: Linux-to-Linux copying?
- From: Christopher SEKIYA <wileyc@example.com>
- Re: [despammed] Re: Linux-to-Linux copying?
- From: Neil Booth <neil@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: ATOK messed up after XF86-4.0.2 upgrade
- Next by Date: Re: Meadow: Can't display Japanese characters
- Prev by thread: Re: [despammed] Re: Linux-to-Linux copying?
- Next by thread: Re: Linux-to-Linux copying?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links