Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Samba on 7.1 not working :(
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Samba on 7.1 not working :(
- From: Matt Doughty <mdoughty@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 10:25:05 +0900
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <21DEAE09F017D111969700A0C98407520572A4C1@example.com>; from SStone@example.com on Thu, May 17, 2001 at 05:56:12PM -0700
- References: <21DEAE09F017D111969700A0C98407520572A4C1@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <5rHXLD.A.k-C.IoHB7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i-jp0
Are we talking a home network here? I'm a bit confused as to why anyone would want to disable encrypted passwords. Its much easier, and more secure(albeit only slightly) to enable encrypted passwords, and just maintain the smbpasswd file. I don't see as it is much less work to patch your boxen to send plain text passwords over the wire, but maybe that is just me. In the case where you have a domain controller it is even easier to passoff the password requests to the PDC, and boom it is both automatic, and more secure. I stay as far away from windows as I can these days, but the samba registry hacks need to go off to a corner, and die..... //Matt ps. you also shouldn't use any M$ operating system that uses LANMAN hashes for authentication(Win95) in a production environment.
- References:
- RE: Samba on 7.1 not working :(
- From: Scott Stone <SStone@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Cisco 2611 as a firewall?
- Next by Date: Re: Cisco 2611 2nd thread
- Prev by thread: RE: Samba on 7.1 not working :(
- Next by thread: Re: Samba on 7.1 not working :(
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links