Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Cisco 2611 as a firewall?
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Cisco 2611 as a firewall?
- From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 10:40:48 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <21DEAE09F017D111969700A0C98407520572A4AA@example.com>; from SStone@example.com on Thu, May 17, 2001 at 10:27:31AM -0700
- References: <21DEAE09F017D111969700A0C98407520572A4AA@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <-hpxOB.A.jCD.B4HB7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
Scott Stone (SStone@example.com) wrote: > heh a Cisco 2611 is underpowered enough without trying to run two T1s *and* > BGP on it :) Two T1s would be fine (heck, a 2501 can do that), but even a partial BGP view would have it on its knees begging for mercy on a regular basis. > except more CPU. and it has 10/100 ethernets, like the 2621), or preferably > a 3600 series. A 3660 stuffed with memory would be very nice, better than a 26xx, but I somehow doubt that his friend is going to be willing to spend the cash. I bet he's only getting the 2611 because the Pipeline 130 is just dying on the vine :-) Jonathan
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Cisco 2611 2nd thread
- Next by Date: XOM (was Re: XIM, kinput2 & Tk)
- Prev by thread: Re: Cisco 2611 as a firewall?
- Next by thread: RE: Cisco 2611 as a firewall?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links