Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: firewalling behind NAT?
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: firewalling behind NAT?
- From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 00:26:39 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <20010522001641.A5613@example.com>; from tom@example.com on Tue, May 22, 2001 at 12:16:41AM +0900
- References: <20010522001641.A5613@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <z3OUQD.A.yFG.XQTC7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
Thomas O'Dowd (tom@example.com) wrote: > Since I'm not really filtering anything else right now, can a cracker > somehow find away through my router to a NAT'd machine on the inside? I > don't think so, but I could be wrong? What happens if the cracker compromises the router? Mmm-hmm, Houston, we have a problem :-) It depends on your paranoia level, of course, but I'd go ahead and firewall on the host, too. Especially since they make it so easy in RH 7.1, you might as well. Jonathan
- References:
- firewalling behind NAT?
- From: "Thomas O'Dowd" <tom@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: firewalling behind NAT?
- Next by Date: [ANN] 6/5 glibc Seminar (IBM TEC-J)
- Prev by thread: firewalling behind NAT?
- Next by thread: RE: firewalling behind NAT?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links