Re: canna port security

[Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>]

Marc Christensen (marc@example.com) wrote:

> instead of application level security.  In that case, you can foget about
> setting up the security for canna in specific as the firewall rule and the
> canna rule would be redundant.

I'd leave it in; it may be redundant, but if anything ever happens
to the firewall (broken rule, incorrect rule, creamed by an
OS upgrade, whatever), you've still got the application-level
security in place to fall back on while you get the firewall
straightened out.

Jonathan