Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: networking trouble
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: networking trouble
- From: B0Ti <9915104t@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 15:26:14 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
- Organization: Kobe University, Japan
- References: <3B0DEE65.3B255773@example.com> <20010525144314.A30956@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <T80QkC.A.gmE.IifD7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- Sender: boti
Jonathan Q wrote: > > IP address: 192.168.1.83 (assigned by the ISP) > Try renumbering this to 192.168.1.10 and see if it helps. > > IP address: 192.168.2.11 > Like above, renumber this to 192.168.1.11 255.255.255.0. The reason I didn't do this was because I assume 192.168.1.* adresses are handled by the ISP, and there is a chance that for example 192.168.1.11 is assigned to somebody else, so if I set laptop or vmware to be the same IP it might interfere with that. But actually I did nmap 192.168.1.* (and 192.168.*.*) a few times, and , and besides the gateway and my own machine nothing else showed up (I suppose this is because of the routing in the gateway.) So would it be safe to use the 192.168.1.0 network for my own subnet also? B0Ti.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: networking trouble
- From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>
- References:
- networking trouble
- From: B0Ti <9915104t@example.com>
- Re: networking trouble
- From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: networking trouble
- Next by Date: Re: networking trouble
- Prev by thread: Re: networking trouble
- Next by thread: Re: networking trouble
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links