Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: RedHat Disk Dangers? [was: Linux and ADSL]
- To: "TLUG mailing list" <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Re: RedHat Disk Dangers? [was: Linux and ADSL]
- From: "SN_Diamond" <Norman.Diamond@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 16:03:30 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1"
- References: <21DEAE09F017D111969700A0C9840752059DA7A2@example.com> <15117.39163.189819.207174@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <3axMMC.A.tHF.D6zF7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
Sorry I've been too busy to read this list for a while. Last week, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > >>>>> "Scott" == Scott Stone <SStone@example.com> writes: > Scott> why? 7.0 did something that I've never, in over 6 years of > Scott> using Linux, come across. For no reason at all, just > Scott> COMPLETELY trashed my ext2fs file system to the point where > Scott> /usr/lib was no longer a directory and /lost+found > Scott> contained only spotty remnants of what used to be in there. > > the ext2fs would > happily write past physical capacity and start reusing in-use blocks. > And trashing directories. Including the /lost+found directory. Oops. > > Didn't matter whether it was > mke2fs /dev/sdc or fdisk /dev/sdc1, mke2fs /dev/sdc1. Neato. Now Linux is Windows 95 compatible. Windows 95 FDISK does the same thing on SCSI hard disks. After getting slaughtered and spending weeks going back to manufacturers and a retail store, I figured out how to reproduce it rather quickly and prove that it's Microsoft's doing. I'm not quite sure of this detail but think it probably sizes the extended partition to end one cylinder past the end of the media, then the last logical drive in the extended partition thinks it occupies that space but actually overlaps the second-to-last logical drive. > As you say, I've never seen this on a fixed disk, I have on one, and followed the details better but am not sure if it's easily reproduced. On a 16GB IDE drive, Windows 95 FDISK sized the extended partition to end at the end of the media, but positioned the last logical drive to end one cylinder past the end of the extended partition. Then I did something a bit different on the same disk, used Windows NT to put an NTFS primary partition in the last 8GB and then used Windows 95 FDISK to put the extended partition in between the C: partition and the NTFS partition. Again on this disk, Windows 95 positioned the extended partition correctly but positioned the last logical drive to end one cylinder past the end of the extended partition, so it overlapped with the NTFS partition. After that, Windows NT wouldn't boot, and the repair mode of the Windows NT boot floppies couldn't repair it. But I didn't get slaughtered by this because I had already learned my lesson and these operations were tests. It is really really sad to see Red Hat copy from Windows 95. Looks like I'd better figure out a way to test... Ah, but you say you haven't seen Red Hat do that on IDE disks, it only does that to SCSI disks? Then my IDE disks might be safe. But, um, maybe I'd better figure out a way to test anyway. -- Norman Diamond
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RedHat Disk Dangers? [was: Linux and ADSL]
- From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>
- Re: RedHat Disk Dangers? [was: Linux and ADSL]
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: DNS is up!
- Next by Date: Re: DNS is up!
- Prev by thread: Re: DNS is up!
- Next by thread: Re: RedHat Disk Dangers? [was: Linux and ADSL]
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links