Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: RAID questions
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: RAID questions
- From: "Jean-Christian Imbeault" <jean_christian@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 11:51:12 -0000
- Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
- Delivered-To: tlug@example.com
- List-Help: <mailto:tlug-request@example.comsubject=help>
- List-Post: <mailto:tlug@example.com>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:tlug-request@example.comsubject=subscribe>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tlug-request@example.comsubject=unsubscribe>
- Old-Return-Path: <jean_christian@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <aXu7TC.A.kxH.pqZS7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
[Jake Morrison wisely suggested] >In your case, it probably doesn't make that much difference, but large mail >servers are usually disk IO bound, so they can't use RAID 5. Mail servers >(and database servers) are usually set up with RAID 1+0 (mirroring, then >striping). Good point! I hadn't thought of that. I'll have to look into what setting 1+0 requires. Which brings me to ask, has anyone tried setting up RAID on Linux. I'd be using RH7.1 and was wondering if RAID support is good or not. The stuff I have read on the web (though possibly dated) seemed to suggest RAID support was still not as good as it could be. Jc _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RAID questions
- From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Localhost connection refused
- Next by Date: Re: Localhost connection refused
- Prev by thread: Re: RAID questions
- Next by thread: Re: RAID questions
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links