Mailing List Archive
Support open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Can canna completely replace {Free}Wnn? (for CJK)
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Can canna completely replace {Free}Wnn? (for CJK)
- From: Marc Christensen <marc@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:53:25 -0600 (MDT)
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- Delivered-To: tlug@example.com
- List-Help: <mailto:tlug-request@example.comsubject=help>
- List-Post: <mailto:tlug@example.com>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:tlug-request@example.comsubject=subscribe>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tlug-request@example.comsubject=unsubscribe>
- Old-Return-Path: <marc@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <npgCrC.A.jtB.bQeT7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
There are many who feel that Wnn has many security holes. At work here they want to dich Wnn in place of canna but we have requirements to have input methods for all languages: Chinese (both simplified and troditional), Japanese and Korean. Is canna capable of providing input methods for all these languages? Or is Wnn the only "Grand Unified IM" (besides IIIMF)? Thanks. -- Marc C. http://www.mecworks.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Can canna completely replace {Free}Wnn? (for CJK)
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Can canna completely replace {Free}Wnn? (for CJK)
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Can canna completely replace {Free}Wnn? (for CJK)
- Prev by Date: RE: RH 6.2 install causes screen to explode
- Next by Date: Re: re blackbox and icewm
- Prev by thread: kterm compile question.
- Next by thread: Can canna completely replace {Free}Wnn? (for CJK)
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |