Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]tar and permissions
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: tar and permissions
- From: Hector Akamine <akamine@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 20:27:26 +0900
- Cc: akamine@example.com
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
- Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
- Delivered-to: tlug@example.com
- List-help: <mailto:tlug-request@example.comsubject=help>
- List-post: <mailto:tlug@example.com>
- List-subscribe: <mailto:tlug-request@example.comsubject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:tlug-request@example.comsubject=unsubscribe>
- Old-return-path: <akamine@example.com>
- Reply-to: tlug@example.com
- Resent-from: tlug@example.com
- Resent-message-id: <_3ONWD.A.MlD.BRq17@example.com>
- Resent-sender: tlug-request@example.com
Hi, I am confused about the meaning of the "preserve permissions" (-p) switch in tar. According to what I have read, using -p keeps the file permissions as the original files. Then, what happens when I use tar without -p? I want to copy the contents of some user's directory using tar. I think I should make the operation as root. If I use -p, will it keep the file-directory permissions and owners as the original ones? What happens if I don't use -p? Thanks in advance -- Hector Akamine <akamine@example.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tar and permissions
- From: Bruno Raoult <braoult@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: nfs and shifting permissions
- Next by Date: Re: tar and permissions
- Previous by thread: Re: nfs and shifting permissions
- Next by thread: Re: tar and permissions
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links