Mailing List Archive
Support open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tlug] Is libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so backward compatable with libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Is libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so backward compatable with libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
- From: Antony Stace <s45652001@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 16:02:11 +0900
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
- Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- In-reply-to: <200202260657.g1Q6vTB01120@example.com>
- References: <200202260657.g1Q6vTB01120@example.com>
Thanks Chris Ummm.....so I should be tracking down an old Redhat package then I guess. I hope they made one with this library in it at some point. On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 15:57:30 +0900 (JST) Christopher SEKIYA <wileyc@example.com> wrote: > > libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so > > Holy Christ. RedHat just doesn't get it, do they? > > No, the two are not compatible. > > -- Chris "libfoo.so.major.minor" Sekiya ------------------------------------------------------------------- _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @example.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Is libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so backward compatable with libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
- From: Christopher SEKIYA
- Re: [tlug] Is libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so backward compatable with libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Is libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so backward compatable with libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Is libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so backward compatable with libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Is libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so backward compatable with libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Is libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so backward compatable with libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |