Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Selective mojibake email
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Selective mojibake email
- From: Viktor Pavlenko <vvp@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 22:00:45 -0500
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
- Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-reply-to: <20020301114157.E27514@example.com>
- References: <006a01c1bff0$a7e7ff20$0301a8c0@example.com><871yf6ji3t.fsf@example.com><20020228162320.GC472@example.com><20020301114157.E27514@example.com>
>>>>> "MD" == Matt Doughty <mdoughty@example.com> writes: MD> [...] >> >> Of course, if you want to talk about deployment and >> documentation, the picture isn't quite so pretty. >> MD> None of it is terribly pretty. Does MS do everything wrong? MD> No of course not, but as far as standards go they tend to MD> implement them their own way often in an apparent attempt to MD> subvert, but sometimes out of apparent laziness where they MD> don't seem to care about operability outside the MS MD> sphere. You are right however documentation is truly horrible. Well, once I had to write a couple of perl scripts to parse and output RTF, a genuine Microsoft invention. Can you believe it, RTF produced by word wouldn't parse according to their own specs! Not to tell you what a dreadful format it was... staying away from microsoft and feeling happy, Viktor P.S. ... and wishing you the same :)
- References:
- [tlug] Selective mojibake email
- From: Glenn Evanish
- Re: [tlug] Selective mojibake email
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Selective mojibake email
- From: Matt Gushee
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Selective mojibake email
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Selective mojibake email
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Selective mojibake email
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Selective mojibake email
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links