Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] multiuser
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: [tlug] multiuser
- From: "A.Sajjad Zaidi" <sajjad@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 17:07:37 +0900
- Content-disposition: inline
- Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-reply-to: <000c01c1ca80$49ef51d0$1500a8c0@example.com>
- References: <000901c1c976$e0d90f10$1500a8c0@example.com> <20020311022309.GA1310@example.com> <000c01c1ca80$49ef51d0$1500a8c0@example.com>
- Sender: "A.Sajjad Zaidi" <sajjad@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 You mean use one as a server for boot images which the others use to boot off the network? Sure. Thats how things have worked for a lot of people in the UNIX/Linux world. - -- A. Sajjad Zaidi System Administrator Technology & Operations Div. Digital Garage Inc. On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 08:14:37PM +0900, hatsuhiro wrote: > Not quite well, but I'll take that "the i386 architecture doesn't > accommodate more than one physical user at the same machine" at once. > However, suppose that we had three i386 machines connected to each other > with Ethernet, and installed one and only one Linux OS with some > applications without diskless technology. Even in this case, is that still > impossible? Why? > > Hoshino > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8jbdIt1KjqyZ+DQ4RArjNAJ98BgpdJtDAmJyD7y522ZdC6qEW9wCfUutV RriYbwRWaF/UQQyBoViDBCA= =3CTE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- References:
- [tlug] multiuser
- From: hatsuhiro
- Re: [tlug] multiuser
- From: A.Sajjad Zaidi
- Re: [tlug] multiuser
- From: hatsuhiro
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] multiuser
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] multiuser
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] multiuser
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] multiuser
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links