Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] partiton
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: [tlug] partiton
- From: Frank Bennett <bennett@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 18:37:23 +0900
- Cc: Frank Bennett <bennett@example.com>
- Content-disposition: inline
- Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
- In-reply-to: <20020403182726.E20124@example.com>
- References: <000901c1dbbb$46594f70$1500a8c0@example.com> <20020403085210.GA30919@example.com> <20020403182726.E20124@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 06:27:26PM +0900, Jim Tittsler wrote: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 05:52:10PM +0900, Frank Bennett wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:29:42PM +0900, hatsuhiro wrote: > > > > > 1. Do we have to have more than one partition when large (like 512MB) > > > capacity of swap space is needed? > > > > It is better to use a separate partition for your swap space. There are [snip] > Some of Hatsuhiro's question may arise from an old Linux > reference. Old kernels (pre 2.2.x I believe) allowed a maximum > of 128MB per swap partition, and so multiple swap partitions [snip] Ouch. There I go again; I misread the question, didn't I. Many thanks for catching that, Jim. Frank Bennett
- References:
- [tlug] partiton
- From: hatsuhiro
- Re: [tlug] partiton
- From: Frank Bennett
- Re: [tlug] partiton
- From: Jim Tittsler
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] partiton
- Next by Date: [tlug] Re: Disk geometry
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] partiton
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] partiton
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links