Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] CrossOver Office
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: [tlug] CrossOver Office
- From: Jake Morrison <jake_morrison@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 00:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
- Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-reply-to: <20020420174438.GB340@example.com>
- Reply-to: Jacob.Morrison@example.com
Matt, --- Matt Gushee <mgushee@example.com> wrote: > > 2) Can you use RTF? It's sort of open. At least, being text-based, > you can decipher it the next time MS makes undocumented changes. And I > did an experiment a couple of weeks ago where I saved a document > in RTF, gave it a .doc file extension, and, ¤䤃¤ѤꬠI could double- > click on it and Word stated up and loaded the doc without comment, > just as if it were a real .doc. Maybe you can do something similar > with Excel and a text-based file format pretending to be an .xls. > Opens up possibilities, doesn't it? Of course, if this practice > becomes widespread, MS will undoubtedly invent the > msOfficeIncorrectFileExtensionError (for your protection, of > course!). RTF is a good solution, in my experience, and MS uses it internally. When you "save as" a Word 97 file for use by earlier versions of Word, it actually saves it as RTF with a .doc extension. So this is actually the "standard" solution :-) Jake __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/
- References:
- Re: [tlug] CrossOver Office
- From: Matt Gushee
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] CrossOver Office
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] CrossOver Office
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] CrossOver Office
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] CrossOver Office
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links