Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] maybe a repetitive question about distros
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 12:26:33 -0400
- From: Josh Glover <jmglov@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] maybe a repetitive question about distros
- References: <200206121439.50025.pietro@example.com> <3D074E3E.B6DA9EC6@example.com> <200206121615.02382.pietro@example.com> <006601c2121e$1a7c5570$2b0aa8c0@example.com> <3D076847.7040809@example.com> <00ae01c21229$2cb87380$2b0aa8c0@example.com>
- Organization: INCOGEN, Inc.
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020606
Luke Kearney wrote: >> >>Right. FreeBSD is absolutely *renowned* for its comprehensive hardware >>support... *koff* > > > Do you feel that FBSD is not stable ? The HW requirements for it are very > modest. No. I dare you to find that in my post. To the contrary, I am a big fan of *BSD, but mainly on servers. I will stick to Linux for my 3D gaming needs! ;) (Actually, I only game on the console systems, but I digress). > For as long as you are not trying to use the absolute latest in video > cards FBSD is quite good I agree, though I think that video cards are not the only area in which FreeBSD lags behind Linux in hardware driver availability. Granted, BSD drivers tend to be a bit more stable than Linux ones, as the BSD developers are a lot more cautious when it comes to releasing new code. > I am not sure that the scoffing is necessary. That is immaterial. Scoffito ergo sum, tovarisch. ;) > NetBSD and OpenBSD are the pits when it comes to hardware so not sure why > you give FBSD the thumbs down. I may be misinformed. I was under the impression that Net supported more hardware than Free. Is this not so? > I would put a FBSD system up against any of your linux > varieties any day in terms of performance I quite agree. In fact, BSD seems to outperform Linux under heavy loads (i.e. busy webservers (read: Google)). > although Linux is nicer as a > desktop if you want to have something close to winblows but not quite. I think you mean "GNOME / KDE are nicer..." ;) My Linux boxes look nothing like Windoze. I only use X on one of them regularly, and it runneth Blackbox. Gotta keep that GNOME shite away at all costs! > I just feel that RH has gotten a bit too automated What do you mean? up2date? Kudzu? As I am fond of saying, sysadmins *can* use Redhat's tools as a crutch, or they can dust off vim, get in the config files and do things properly! -- Josh Glover <jmglov@example.com> Associate Systems Administrator INCOGEN, Inc.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] maybe a repetitive question about distros
- From: Luke Kearney
- References:
- [tlug] maybe a repetitive question about distros
- From: Pietro Zuco
- Re: [tlug] maybe a repetitive question about distros
- From: B0Ti
- Re: [tlug] maybe a repetitive question about distros
- From: Pietro Zuco
- Re: [tlug] maybe a repetitive question about distros
- From: Luke Kearney
- Re: [tlug] maybe a repetitive question about distros
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] maybe a repetitive question about distros
- From: Luke Kearney
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Disparity between quota and du output
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Disparity between quota and du output
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] maybe a repetitive question about distros
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] maybe a repetitive question about distros
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links