Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] backups
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 16:20:32 +0900
- From: Mauro Sauco <mauro.sauco@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] backups
- References: <20020622233848.GA31991@example.com> <200206241533.48662.mauro.sauco@example.com> <876609noyy.fsf@example.com>
On Monday 24 June 2002 03:57 pm, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > The real issue is ssize_t (or its equivalent for your extension of > POSIX types to big file sizes). Unix filesystem semantics generally > has operations return a number of bytes successfully operated on, or > -1 for failure of some kind (EOF, error, whatever). > > You probably could cast ssize_t returns to size_t and get > (2^WORDSIZE - 2) instead of (2^(WORDSIZE-1) - 1) as the maximum size, > but the idea of returning -1 for EOF is already broken enough, let's > not strain ourselves. ;-) So, isn't it true !!!. 2.4 kernel limit is 16/32 Tera (4K-8K blocksize * 32-bit block-number). Thanks to the NWFS (NWFS 2.4.1, I think) files could be even larger (256TB) In any case, the " ssize_t " issue was very instructive ;-) //mauro//
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] backups
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- [tlug] backups
- From: Jack Morgan
- Re: [tlug] backups
- From: Mauro Sauco
- Re: [tlug] backups
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] backups
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Root - NO KDE
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] backups
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] backups
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links