Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] linux/ms web page problem
- Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 13:33:54 -0600
- From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] linux/ms web page problem
- References: <1025350413.2955.14.camel@example.com> <15645.50109.304762.438456@example.com> <20020629171950.GA354@example.com> <15645.65027.387235.411597@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
On Sat, Jun 29, 2002 at 08:35:47PM +0200, mocm@example.com wrote: > > > Use http://validator.w3.org/ to validate your page and complain to the > > > manufacturer of publisher/front page for not complying to standards. > > > > Do you really think that will make a difference with MS? They know damn > > well their products generate bad HTML. If they cared they would have > > fixed them a long time ago. > > I don't know those products or who makes them. I would never use them > anyway, but if you don't complain about such obvious flaws, then they > certainly won't be fixed. Just tell them, you will buy another > product, which is of course no real threat when you are dealing with a > monopoly :(. Well, fortunately, Microsoft is nowhere near having a monopoly on web development tools. And in principle I agree that people dissatisfied with products should complain about them. I just really doubt that it will do much good in this case. Given how well Microsoft implements Internet standards when it suits them (Internet Explorer being a case in point), and the number of representatives they have on W3C committees, it is simply inconceivable that they are unaware of their products' being non-compliant. I submit that they are deliberately producing non-compliant products, because: * They want to pack their products full of cool features. Features make good demos, and demos sell products. The proprietary cruft they stuff into the HTML makes it easy to implement cool features that appeal to the guys with the checkbooks. * Obfuscated HTML impairs interoperability. Poor interoperability drives businesses to "standardize" on Microsoft products. Now if you think that a few noble developers' complaining to Microsoft is going to change something, I can't prove you wrong. My feeling, though, is that they know exactly what they're doing, and our time is better spent providing alternatives and/or educating people about why they should be using something other than Front Page or Publisher to create web sites. As you suggest: > Maybe if he tells his boss, about the validator (sounds official ;-)), > he will see what kind of sub-standard product they are using. Much more worthwhile than complaining to Microsoft, IMHO. -- Matt Gushee Englewood, Colorado, USA mgushee@example.com http://www.havenrock.com/
- References:
- [tlug] linux/ms web page problem
- From: Eric O. Flores
- [tlug] linux/ms web page problem
- From: mocm
- Re: [tlug] linux/ms web page problem
- From: Matt Gushee
- Re: [tlug] linux/ms web page problem
- From: mocm
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] linux/ms web page problem
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] linux/ms web page problem
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] linux/ms web page problem
- Next by thread: [tlug] Re: linux/ms web page problem
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links