Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] why so slow?
- Date: 02 Jul 2002 12:22:16 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] why so slow?
- References: <200205311633.49105.pietro@example.com>
- Organization: The XEmacs Project
- User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Informed Management (RC2))
>>>>> "Pietro" == Pietro Zuco <pietro@example.com> writes: Pietro> I would like to know if there are a way to improve the Pietro> start proccess of applications. I remember that there was Pietro> some time ago an utily of Norton for win that served to Pietro> improve the time to start applications. Maybe are there Pietro> some utility equivalent for Linux? Or some way to make Pietro> faster the start proccess ? As pointed out, MS preloads certain crucial (to its marketing and legal defense) programs into memory. This is why Linux typically starts up in a 10th of the time of Windows (and much of the time taken by Linux is the distro's stock install kernel trying to init drivers for nonexistent hardware ;-). Most *nix apps support multiple windows, and some kind of IPC protocol. I forget what it is with Netscrap/Mozzerilla, but there is a protocol to send an URL to a running browser. X?Emacs has gnuclient. So if you _know_ you're going to be using the app a lot, you start it at login, go get some coffee, and thereafter configure to use the IPC protocols to create new windows quickly not start new instances slowly. Eg, for X?Emacs, just set EDITOR=gnuclient in your environment and everything is easy. (Note to vi abusers: I'm just talking about what I know; of course EDITOR=vi works just as fast, but not as well ;-) And that's a new instance of vi, which doesn't help Pietro understand the idea.) Also, you can often reduce startup time by use of xtoolwait, which typically reduces the amount of time for windows to appear so that you can do some work. The total startup time can actually be slightly longer, but you don't have to wait for your xdaliclock (which takes forever to appear) to pop up before the first xterm does. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN My nostalgia for Icon makes me forget about any of the bad things. I don't have much nostalgia for Perl, so its faults I remember. Scott Gilbert c.l.py
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] why so slow?
- From: Pietro Zuco
- References:
- [tlug] why so slow?
- From: Pietro Zuco
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] line ending in XEmacs
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Confessions of a closet OpenBSD user
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] why so slow?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] why so slow?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links