Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][tlug] Re: Class B Hubs not suitable for data center use?
- Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 12:22:08 +0200
- From: Tobias Diedrich <td@example.com>
- Subject: [tlug] Re: Class B Hubs not suitable for data center use?
- References: <20020828203632.GS11721@example.com> <E17kEUb-0007MJ-00@example.com> <20020831004904.2DAE.SL@example.com> <20020831045538.GB1402@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
Jonathan Byrne wrote: > >I am sure Jonathan knows this, but the above is not _completely_ true. > >A switch does forward packets that are destined to unknown hosts (i.e. > >not in its MAC cache [not ARP cache]) to all (but the originating) ports. > > This is a good point, thanks for bringing it up. > > It's a very small window, though, because when a new host is connected > to the switch, its MAC address gets cached quickly. The LAN addresses are And at least lowcost switches fall back to hub behaviour if you overflow their MAC-Caches with an ARP-Flood... -- Tobias PGP: 0x9AC7E0BC This mail is made of 100% recycled bits Now playing: K-taro Takanami - Yasashisa no Shouzou
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Class B Hubs not suitable for data center use?
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] Class B Hubs not suitable for data center use?
- From: Jonathan Byrne
- Re: [tlug] Class B Hubs not suitable for data center use?
- From: Stephen Lee
- Re: [tlug] Class B Hubs not suitable for data center use?
- From: Jonathan Byrne
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Class B Hubs not suitable for data center use?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Class B Hubs not suitable for data center use?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Class B Hubs not suitable for data center use?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Class B Hubs not suitable for data center use?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links