Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 16:45:27 +0200
- From: Godwin Stewart <gstewart@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- References: <20020903012221.GD28108@example.com><E17mCoD-0003UN-00@example.com><20020903155806.3280bce1.gstewart@example.com><E17mEd1-0007LK-00@example.com>
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 23:22:53 +0900, Ulrich Plate <plate@example.com> squashed this out of the keyboard: > You know, Linux advocacy is a funny thing. Too few years ago, web > designers all over the planet were flooded with demands to keep websites > downward compatible to Lynx. Now, but when it comes to something much more > important like security, all of a sudden everybody refuses to include > those with the lesser tools... If it was OE we're talking about here, I'd > shut up immediately. Alas, I've been using KMail 1.3.2 in Mandrake 8.2 all > evening, and neither is a Redmond product... We're talking about two different things here. Making everything compatible with Lynx meant sacrifying aesthetics, whereas making everything here compatible with OE means sacrifying security. Why? Because RFC-3156 compliant mailers don't recognise ASCII-armoured signatures as such and therefore don't see that the mail is signed at all. True, KMail isn't a Redmond product, but the distro you're using has nothing to do with it. I could pull up KMail in my Slackware but that doesn't make Slackware any better/shittier. > Nope, that's not what I meant. Further down, past some of the pix: Mea culpa. I didn't read down that far. > Something like this would be nice, no? Can't see why. It shouldn't do ASCII-Armour in the first place :) > Ulrich Plate <-- trying to get the &#%$'&% GPGOE plugin on W2K to run... I tried - and failed - last night. The Win32 version of GnuPG doesn't seem to be able to retrieve public keys from anywhere... Still, it was late at night. Maybe I overlooked something obvious (like opening the internet connection...) -- G. Stewart -- gstewart@example.com gstewart@example.com Registered Linux user #284683 GnuPG key : BA3D01C6 (pgp.mit.edu) Fingerprint: C3DF C686 6572 6E59 E3E4 0F40 2B9A 2218 BA3D 01C6 --------------------------------------------------------------- Spotted in a toilet of a London office: TOILET OUT OF ORDER. PLEASE USE FLOOR BELOW.Attachment: pgp00038.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: Josh Glover
- References:
- [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: Scott Robbins
- Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: Ulrich Plate
- Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: Godwin Stewart
- Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: Ulrich Plate
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Next by Date: [tlug] > Administrivia < GPG signatures
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links