Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] PPPoE / Linksys BEFSR41
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 23:43:15 -0500
- From: Scott Robbins <scottro@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] PPPoE / Linksys BEFSR41
- References: <200209241137.22503.yeehi@example.com> <E17tgH1-0007yE-00@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4i-ja.1
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 12:22:07PM +0900, Jonathan Byrne wrote: > > > On 9/24/2002, "n" <yeehi@example.com> wrote: > > We usually use our names around here. "n" doesn't cut it. This from a guy who often signs himself J. :) > > >http://www.linksys.com/products/product.asp?grid=23&prid=20 > > >Is this router PPPoE compliant? > > Quoted from the page you linked: > > "This unit requires an external Cable or DSL modem with an Ethernet RJ-45 > interface." > > In other words, no, it doesn't speak pppoe. That page is also so filled > with marketing hype it made me want to vomit. Here's my favorite quote: > > "This cutting-edge combination of router and switch technology eliminates > the need to buy an additional hub or switch and serves your network as a > completely dedicated, full duplex backbone." Wow I want one. :) Actually, to folks who work for ISPs, or even we lamers who studied for Cisco certs, the word backbone has a totally different meaning--to us it's a bit silly, but to the home user, it's probably an accurate statement. :) (which could lead me into a whole new thread about what is a backbone for a home network, but anyway....) Anyway, as to the pppOe question--as has been said, there's a bit of research that you should do, but while I'm not sure "compliant" is the proper term, in the recent Linksys routers there is a checkbox in the config section which will enable it to work with modems from ISPs like Verizon here in the states who use pppOe. > > They should have a warning message on a page that contains such crap. A > DSL connection may be full duplex, but it's certainly neither dedicated nor > a backbone. Now Jonathan, how do you know? Have you ever asked those routers? Sure, maybe they goof off a little, but I think they're----ohhhh, sorry, misunderstood. Anyway, to be serious for a moment, yes, the router will work with an ISP that uses pppOe. -- Scott PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 D575 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Xander: Generally speaking, when scary things get scared, not good.Attachment: pgp00148.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [tlug] PPPoE / Linksys BEFSR41
- From: n
- Re: [tlug] PPPoE / Linksys BEFSR41
- From: Jonathan Byrne
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] b-flets
- Next by Date: [tlug] Redhat 8.0
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] PPPoE / Linksys BEFSR41
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] PPPoE / Linksys BEFSR41
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links