Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] PPPoE / Linksys BEFSR41
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 02:26:23 -0600
- From: Takeshi Hakamata <tkh@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] PPPoE / Linksys BEFSR41
- References: <200209241137.22503.yeehi@example.com><E17tgH1-0007yE-00@example.com>
- Organization: Computer Science Department, University of New Mexico
- User-agent: Wanderlust/2.9.14 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)FLIM/1.14.3 (Unebigoryōmae) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
I do have a BEFSR41 router and use it at home to connect my computers to the cable network. At Tue, 24 Sep 2002 12:22:07 +0900, Jonathan Byrne wrote: > > On 9/24/2002, "n" <yeehi@example.com> wrote: > > We usually use our names around here. "n" doesn't cut it. > > >http://www.linksys.com/products/product.asp?grid=23&prid=20 > > >Is this router PPPoE compliant? > > Quoted from the page you linked: > > "This unit requires an external Cable or DSL modem with an Ethernet RJ-45 > interface." > > In other words, no, it doesn't speak pppoe. That page is also so filled > with marketing hype it made me want to vomit. Here's my favorite quote: Yes, it does speak PPPoE. Remember that you need to use PPPoE software to establish the connection even if you have the DSL modem. This router does that part of the work. > "This cutting-edge combination of router and switch technology eliminates > the need to buy an additional hub or switch and serves your network as a > completely dedicated, full duplex backbone." > > They should have a warning message on a page that contains such crap. A > DSL connection may be full duplex, but it's certainly neither dedicated nor > a backbone. I think they should state that the full-duplex backbone means LAN connection. > >WIth this b flets fibre optic connection what is the important thing in > >getting as close to 100 Mbps as possible? Is there any way I can test > it? > > The connection has a physical rate of 100 mbps. It is not possible to push > 100 megabits of data through the line. Even if a single FTP site would > feed you 100 mbps downloads, and even if there were no smaller links in > between you and that site, TCP overhead would make 100 mbps impossible. In > the real world, you are not likely to utlilize anywhere near the full > capacity of the line, which is kind of the point of having a 100 megabit > line: get more bandwidth than you can ever use. The fastest FTP transfer I > have ever seen ran at 20 megabits per second, which was astonishing. The > second fastest one I've had was 10 megabitgs. This router's WAN port is 10Mbps. So, it can be a bottleneck if you have a really faster connection. I think there are lots of faster routers available in Japan. Takeshi
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] PPPoE / Linksys BEFSR41
- From: Stephen Lee
- References:
- [tlug] PPPoE / Linksys BEFSR41
- From: n
- Re: [tlug] PPPoE / Linksys BEFSR41
- From: Jonathan Byrne
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Grub Nerd Test
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Redhat 8.0
- Previous by thread: Netiquette (was: Re: [tlug] PPPoE / Linksys BEFSR41)
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] PPPoE / Linksys BEFSR41
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links