Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Yet Another PGP question
- Date: 07 Oct 2002 22:59:11 +0900
- From: Stuart Bouyer <stuart@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Yet Another PGP question
- References: <20021007220000.6667b766.plate@example.com>
On 月, 2002-10-07 at 22:00, Ulrich Plate wrote: > Spoke to Ryan Shaw off-list earlier who suggested I ask around the list > rather than just him. The thing is, I've imported everybody's public > keys (everybody who posted to TLUG over the past few weeks, that is). > Now, for most people who sign their messages I get GOOD signatures all > the time (the CAPS for good vs. bad is a Sylpheed phenomenon, > apologies), but two TLUG regulars (Ryan and Stewart Bouyer) show BAD > signatures in my mail client, as if they've had their messages edited > after signing them (that's one of the possible explanations, says the > GnuPG handbook). Even stranger than that is what happens to Chris > Mague's messages when they arrive in my inbox: I've imported three (3) > apparently valid public keys for his address, but I still get "no public > key to verify the signature". His are the only signatures this last > phenomenon occurred with so far. > > Do any of the people who - unlike me - have been doing this for a while > know what's going on? Why are signatures BAD for me and not for others > (I assume other people get Ryan's et al. messages with good signatures)? > Why would three public keys still not be enough to verify a signature? I think this has to do with how your email client handles pgp attachments. I'm using evolution and have no problem authenticating signatures made with evolution, slypheed, mutt, but I always get BAD signature returns from kmail. Looking at your email in source (aka plain text mode), I get this line Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="=.KpsMXXs2GmGiiv" followed by some mail headers then --=.KpsMXXs2GmGiiv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <body of email> --=.KpsMXXs2GmGiiv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature <gpg signature> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.KpsMXXs2GmGiiv-- <TLUG footer> with kmail I get <mail headers> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- <mail body> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- <pgp signature> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- <TLUG footer> It appears that evolution doesn't understand this format of encoding/seperation of message parts. If I save the email to a file and run gpg --verify on it manually it always shows good signature. Hope this is helpful StuAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Yet Another PGP question
- From: Ulrich Plate
- References:
- [tlug] Yet Another PGP question
- From: Ulrich Plate
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Yet Another PGP question
- Next by Date: [tlug] [announcement] 10/11 TLUG nomikai meeting
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Yet Another PGP question
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Yet Another PGP question
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links