Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Is linguistics OT at all?
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:20:10 -0500
- From: Josh Glover <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Is linguistics OT at all?
- References: <CB32A900-5D69-11D8-93BC-003065D61928@example.com> <opr297dguc0fabl5@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i-ja.1
Quoth Shawn (Fri 2004-02-13 08:54:42AM +0900): > >Is linguistics OT at all? :p > > Couldn't we say that both computer science and linguistics are concerned > with collections of elements and thier acceptable orderings (grammar). We could, and it is no coincidence that many geeks (especially geeks with formal Computer Science backgrounds) are quite interested in linguistics. Noam Chomsky is a diety to both linguists and Computer Scientists (and, I suppose, radical left-wingers ;), after all. -- Josh Glover GPG keyID 0xDE8A3103 (C3E4 FA9E 1E07 BBDB 6D8B 07AB 2BF1 67A1 DE8A 3103) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys DE8A3103Attachment: pgp00034.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Is linguistics OT at all?
- From: Raymond Regalado
- (OT) Chomsky (Re: [tlug] Is linguistics OT at all?)
- From: Tapio Peltonen
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Hallo to everybody
- From: BABA Yoshihiko
- [tlug] Is linguistics OT at all?
- From: Shawn
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] Is linguistics OT at all?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Is linguistics OT at all?
- Previous by thread: [tlug] Is linguistics OT at all?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Is linguistics OT at all?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links