Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Don't Hijack Threads/OO.org MIME types
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:51:43 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Don't Hijack Threads/OO.org MIME types
- References: <20040221233909.GF17307@example.com>
- Organization: The XEmacs Project
- User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.5 (celeriac, linux)
>>>>> "jb" == Jonathan Byrne <jq@example.com> writes: jb> you have instead hijacked a thread yourself. That's true but harshly stated. He did change the subject. Nor did Martin hijack the thread. He followed up to a specific comment that I made (which was apropos in its context of the self-introduction thread), and properly changed the subject. However, if he did _not_ followup, but instead started a new thread, no MUA I know except the Emacs-based ones would be able to find my post at all, and even the Emacs MUAs would require substantial effort. That's something I really hate---not being able to find the parent. It's also true that in many borderline cases what constitutes thread hijacking varies from group to group. In some groups changing the subject is considered sufficient. In a group like TLUG, and in Lyle's particular case, I agree that starting fresh was mandatory. But that is assuming the technical knowledge of how threading works---ie, the RFC 2822 In-Reply-To and References headers. Recent Windows/Mac escapees should be assumed NOT to have it, because unless they're using X?Emacs, they don't have a decent MUA available. roy lo deserves the treatment he got; he's had plenty of public instruction, some excellent private tuition (and I've written to him in private, too), and learned nothing. Lyle didn't deserve to be shouted at (and what's wrong with your MUA, can't you inline screenshots or cut'n'paste from the summary display?! ;-) Anyway, what really should be available (and is not, in _any_ MUA I know of including Gnus) are manual thread-manipulation commands. Cf the commands used by bug trackers to manipulate issues---I'm seriously considering using Roundup to manage my mail for this reason, although I'll probably write something for Emacs instead. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Don't Hijack Threads/OO.org MIME types
- From: Viktor Pavlenko
- Re: [tlug] Don't Hijack Threads/OO.org MIME types
- From: Jonathan Byrne
- [tlug] Re: Don't Hijack Threads/OO.org MIME types
- From: Tobias Diedrich
- References:
- [tlug] Don't Hijack Threads/OO.org MIME types
- From: Jonathan Byrne
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] SevenFilesFromOneOpnOf?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] ThreadHijacking/Sorry(RedFace)
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Trying...(+IroIro)
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Don't Hijack Threads/OO.org MIME types
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links