Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 10:59:03 +0900
- From: Shawn <javajunkie@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- References: <200409022259.56931.rondonko@example.com> <20040902141815.GA10856@example.com> <20040902174117.GC7146%jmglov@example.com> <871xhk89bb.fsf@example.com>
On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 09:50, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > >>>>> "Josh" == Josh Glover <tlug@example.com> writes: > > Josh> It generates between 200-500 spams a day, about %15 of which > Josh> are currently beating my SpamAssassin setup. > > SpamAssassin currently sucks, mostly because they have spent more time > on writing new improved versions of the code than they have on > updating recipes. Cf. http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html. What about razor (working in conjunction with spamassassin) -- distributed, collaborative, spam detection and filtering network. Through user contribution, Razor establishes a distributed and constantly updating catalogue of spam in propagation that is consulted by email clients to filter out known spam. Too much of a risk -- need to open 2703 (Razor2) and TCP port 7 (Echo)? Too slow? http://razor.sourceforge.net/ I just use it for me and no lists so can't say anything about what your performance hit would be. -- Shawn <javajunkie@example.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- References:
- [tlug] TLUG spam?
- From: Wayne
- Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- From: Jim Tittsler
- Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- Next by Date: [tlug] [tlug-digest] Thanks Steve for emacs and utf-8 explanation
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] TLUG spam?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links