Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] binary search of binary data
- Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 07:52:48 -0800
- From: Dave Brown <dagbrown@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] binary search of binary data
- References: <20041225205936.GA2199@example.com> <87llbjj4xw.fsf@example.com> <20041227145652.GC2199@example.com> <87fz1rhy0m.fsf@example.com> <20041228041814.GD2199@example.com> <871xd9hezi.fsf@example.com> <20041229145051.GE2199@example.com> <20041229151205.GA24615@example.com> <20041229154308.GG2199@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 12:43:08AM +0900, Edward Wright wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 07:12:05AM -0800, Dave Brown wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 11:50:51PM +0900, Edward Wright wrote: > > > I don't know how to make prinf output the byte values. It'll ouput the > > > hex representation no problem.... > > > > > > I tried using it to create the above mentioned file like so: > > > > > > printf $'\x26\x9d\x00\x00\x28\x9d\x00\x00' >testfile > > > > Why try so hard? Why not just use echo? > > I believe prinf (with no format string) and echo -n are functionally > equivalent. echo is a shell builtin and printf is an external program. Save the PIDs! (Shell builtins will run faster, if you have lots of them.) > > :) [~] echo -n $'\x26\x9d\x00\x00\x28\x9d\x00\x00' | od -t x1 > > 0000000 26 9d 00 00 28 9d 00 00 > > 0000010 > > :) [~] > > > > 1) again, I need the byte values, not the hex representation, so I'm > not sure what this gets me... The "od -t x1" is just to demonstrate that the raw byte-value output is, indeed, what I claim it is. Instead of piping it to od, you can (say) dump it into a file. > 2) interestingly, when I used the exact command you used, I got > different output: > > echo -n $'\x26\x9d\x00\x00\x28\x9d\x00\x00' | od -t x1 > 0000000 26 9d > 0000002 > > truncated at the null byte. Hmm... Oh, hrm, that's interesting. I'm using zsh, which preserves the entire output. I just verified it with my bash-3.00 and it does, indeed, truncate. I just sent in a bug report to the bash folks about this--I think that's incorrect behaviour. --Dave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] binary search of binary data
- From: Dave Brown
- Re: [tlug] binary search of binary data
- From: Edward Wright
- References:
- [tlug] binary search of binary data
- From: Edward Wright
- Re: [tlug] binary search of binary data
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] binary search of binary data
- From: Edward Wright
- Re: [tlug] binary search of binary data
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] binary search of binary data
- From: Edward Wright
- Re: [tlug] binary search of binary data
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] binary search of binary data
- From: Edward Wright
- Re: [tlug] binary search of binary data
- From: Dave Brown
- Re: [tlug] binary search of binary data
- From: Edward Wright
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] binary search of binary data
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] binary search of binary data
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] binary search of binary data
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] binary search of binary data
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links