Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Network with Windows and Linux
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:21:51 +0900
- From: Patrick Niessen <tlug.niessen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Network with Windows and Linux
- References: <877jasw5zp.fsf@example.com> <20051129043820.31690.qmail@example.com>
On 11/29/05, Gerald Naughton <naughton123@example.com> wrote: > how to sync passwords between Samba Server/User > A/Cs/Mail Server > /Web Server etc > > > Maybe the only way is LDAP with Samba > > My ultimate goal is get rid of my Windows 2000 Domain > Server ;-> > We have been using Samba on old compaq proliant's with linux as a file server for 4 or 5 years at our company now. We also have NT4 controller (currently required by the Exchange setup) as well as an AD controller to which we will migrate next year. The thing you want to think about first is which is your authentication server, as syncronising passwords is pretty messy: 1.In our case the accounts are defined on Windows and other services use it to check passwords. If you have windows servers already and a part of an international organisation's network this may be the best way. 2. On the other hand, you may decide that Samba should keep your user data, so it will act as your PDC. Or you keep account data on another unix system (this seems less straightforward as a lot of tweaking needs to be done by you). Linux systems can authenticate to a Windows NT4 domain by using the pam_smb module. This will allow you to setup ssh, ftp and other services to be available to windows accounts. You can then also configure other linux services to use pam for authentication (I think there may be a mod_pam for apache). We have a simple smb authentication using smbclient -> you pass trhough username and password and if the return value is TRUE the user is authorised. For Active Directory, it seems that with enough work you can use pam_krb5 (not sure the name but its kerberos anyway) in the same way. Web applications are easier to authenticate: just use an LDAP call with the users credentials to the AD server - if accepted user is authenticated. LDAP can then also be used to check for group membership. For simple File Serving tasks inside an existing NT domain you can use winbindd. This will check with the domain controller at login time and then keep authentication cached. It also maintains user/group id mapping to Windows accounts. So passwords are always kept only on the windows server and no syncronisation takes place. It is however critical that you backup this mapping - if it is lost you still have all the files but don't know who owns them! since Samba 3 there are various storage options for winbind. The only useful one really is ldap backend, as it allows easy and consistent backup / replication an it also guarantees that all samba servers use the SAME unix ids. I also heard that if you have rights to the AD root you could also install a special LDAP schema into active directory, that would save you from maintaining a seperate LDAP server. You can also set up LDAP authentication seperate from samba and windows. For this to work Linux can use pam_ldap and windows needs to be hacked with a new "gina" module (the one that handles the authentication). If you google "windows gina authentication" you will probably find the project site. Real password sync is also an option either using samba, or the free Unix Services for Windows as released by Microsoft. One important thing to consider is for file serving. So called "opportunistic locking" while said to increase access speed dramatically, often causes problems such as locked files after they were closed, or even sometimes data loss when working with office apps. You have to confirm this and if it causes problems switch it off. Samba says its a design flaw of CIFS protocol and that samba behaves according to protocol. However real windows doesn't seem to have this problem so maybe they don't care because its not happening to them. Also you have to think about / and experiment with the file and folder permissions. Do you use only basic unix perms or ACLs? Permissions and ACLs on a samba share look strange from windows and can be very difficult to understand. ACLS are also not backed up by most linux apps like tar and rsync... If you spend some time on designing the layout of your shares you will be able to live with simple unix permissions. Samba 3 finally permits Unicode encoding, but you must set it up before hand. Otherwise you must set up client encoding options which leads english windows to display boxes unless the appropriate locale is selected. One thing that seems to be mentioned is that nfs and samba do not play well with each other, so you better use nfs for readonly access if really required, or separate nfs and windows directories. Thing I like about samba is the option to only show files and directories that the user has permission to - so if no permission he cannot see it. Netware had it already over 10 years ago, but windows still displays everything and then gives an error - permission denied. The samba as a project is one of the best linux applications, however documentation is not perfect and some of the system design decisions were not too good. In Samba 4 they talk about including ldap inside samba, but have to see how this works out. Hope this gave you a few hints for searching further. -- Patrick Niessen
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Network with Windows and Linux
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Network with Windows and Linux
- From: Gerald Naughton
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] SVN: Your Environment, BerkleyDB/Web or FSFS?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Subversion (was: More Tech Meeting Torrents)
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Network with Windows and Linux
- Next by thread: [tlug] Aki Day???
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links