Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Bleeding pragmata (was: Re: unicode and Perl- how topass command line unicode arguments)
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:11:33 +0900
- From: Ian Wells <ijw@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Bleeding pragmata (was: Re: unicode and Perl- how topass command line unicode arguments)
- References: <30ce84360602161543t37f3dc6ak@example.com><d8fcc0800602161631h3ca19eeeq@example.com>
On 17/02/06, Josh Glover <jmglov@example.com> wrote:OK, sure. But most pragmata (at least in Perl) tend to belong at the
top of the file, because they are GLOBAL.
No they aren't, they're usually active for the remainder of the scope (e.g. file).
And programmers who put globals anywhere but the top of the file shall
taste my wrath, and verily thus!
Globals are bad, m'kay?
Although if I want a global (or file static) somewhere localised I might well not put it at the top of the file. I certainly don't put variable definitions at the top of functions any more.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Bleeding pragmata (was: Re: unicode and Perl- how topass command line unicode arguments)
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Bleeding pragmata (was: Re: unicode and Perl- how topass command line unicode arguments)
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Bleeding pragmata (was: Re: unicode and Perl- how topass command line unicode arguments)
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Bleeding pragmata (was: Re: unicode and Perl- how topass command line unicode arguments)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links