Re: [tlug] "Subject:" (The message doesn't need to be in the title....)

["Lyle (Hiroshi) Saxon" <ronfaxon@example.com>]

Jim wrote:

> > [LHS] Why put the message in the title? 

> By title, I presume you mean "Subject: ". 

This is a good example of your sophistry and nastiness.  It's quite
clear what it means and here you are again bending over backwards to be
nasty.  Why do you do that?

> > Are you afraid people are going to 
> > delete your message when they see your name ... 

> Actually, with a specific "Subject: " readers could decide 
> whether or not to read a letter without having to open the 
> letter first, so I'm making it easier to skip letters. 

Sounds reasonable, but you are the king of title changing (and yes,
"title" does indeed mean "subject").  But hey, I would *rather* change
the title of each and every message than leave it alone.  If that's what
people like, I'll gleefully comply!  I suspect most people would prefer
that not be done however....

Lyle