Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 07:37:28 -0400
- From: Jim <jep200404@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- References: <20060426224449.575dbc90.jep200404@example.com> <20060427035833.12665.qmail@example.com>
Gerald Naughton wrote: > [(restored attribution) Jim wrote:] > > By "internal s/w", do you mean (proprietary) software > > developed internally by your company, > > and that you were using that software for benchmarking? > Yes proprietary software was my benchmark . Thanks. That answers part of my question. I'm focussing on the word "internal". By "internal", did you mean that the program was developed _internally_ by your company? > If your next Q , [is "[is it confidential ?["?] That is not my next question.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- From: Gerald Naughton
- References:
- Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel
- From: Jim
- Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel
- From: Gerald Naughton
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Linux Filesystems Comparison Article
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links