Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:19:05 +0900
- From: "Josh Glover" <jmglov@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- References: <20060427224302.1dbacd7c.jep200404@example.com> <20060428044448.1277.qmail@example.com>
On 28/04/06, Gerald Naughton <naughton123@example.com> wrote: > Wow Jim , you`re going into detail on syntax > Internal s/w means that we`ve access to it > (even some source code ) The reason that he is going into detail on syntax is that the syntax of your original post was less than clear. I still don't really know what you mean, other than (thanks to some clarification) the 2.6 kernel is faster that the 2.4 kernel for some of your applications. Which applications, no-one knows. -Josh
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- From: David Stibbe
- Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- From: Michael(tm) Smith
- Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- From: Michael(tm) Smith
- References:
- Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- From: Jim
- Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- From: Gerald Naughton
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] MySQL and utf8 Japanese characters. Again.
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] MySQL and utf8 Japanese characters. Again.
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] 2.6 Kernel vs 2.4 Kernel: "internal s/w"
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links