Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:50:18 +0200
- From: Botond Botyanszki <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- References: <44CEC200.7050501@example.com> <20060801031124.GG17068@example.com> <877j1s6g9t.fsf@example.com> <44CF436C.1050306@example.com> <87slkfbz5f.fsf@example.com> <44D042D0.1020600@example.com> <87hd0v9vpd.fsf@example.com> <44D0B5FB.7030609@example.com>
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 23:26:03 +0900 Dave M G <martin@example.com> wrote: > And then I ensured I was in the right directory and successfully ran > "sudo make modules modules_install". I forgot to add that the above command only installs modules. Since CONFIG_NETFILTER=y is a feature in the kernel, you need to install the new kernel as well.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Dave M G
- Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Mauro Sauco
- Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Dave M G
- Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Dave M G
- Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- From: Dave M G
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad? [SOLVED]
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Is having no "iptables" bad?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links