Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Making sure people get the message
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:24:03 +0900
- From: <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Making sure people get the message
- References: <451E71F4.8090202@example.com> <17694.40600.245599.76700@example.com> <20060930211732.15ac4b70.jep200404@example.com> <451F5F4A.6040403@example.com> <20061001112537.003930ef.godwin.stewart@example.com> <17696.35385.657311.292975@example.com> <4520D404.1090502@example.com> <452C8025.9040004@example.com>
Dave M G writes: > at least some measure of spamminess. Emails from hotmail got at least 1 > point on Spamassassins's scale (where a score of 5 means it's definitely > spam). A score of 5 means you can have some confidence that you're not throwing away something that you would rather keep. I personally don't throw away anything less than a 10, and it's saved my butt on two occasions (well, in one case it was a mass-mailing so I could have gotten it from a colleague, but my boss doesn't save his mail properly, so a request for resend would mean a trip to the doghouse for me). Unfortunately, there are lots of ISPs who will lower, rather than raise, the threshold. > This is odd to me because emails through majordomo seem to be the ones > that have the most trouble getting through to users. I know that emails > from my majordomo lists are almost always blocked by Hotmail, and > recently by Yahoo accounts and by mac.com. > > Is the problem with mailing lists in general having a bad rep? It's mailing lists in general, and it's only half that they have a bad rep, and that proportion is dropping rapidly. Among other things, AOL recently pioneered the practice of charging multiple mailers for reliable access to their customers. They got a storm of protest, and backed off the worst aspects of the proposal, but be sure that it will reappear repeatedly in various guises, precisely because it's so easy to claim that whatever it is is an antispam measure. Obviously there is strong incentive to drive the reliability of non-paying lists through the floor. I'm sure that if AOL pulls it off, Hotmail, Yahoo, Home.com, mac.com, and maybe even gmail will dogpile on. > Is there anything that can be done about it? Choose your subscribers well. I have zero trouble with AOL, Hotmail, and Yahoo. I also have 3 (out of 842) subscribers to Hotmail and Yahoo, none from AOL. It's been at least three years since I've dealt with a non-receipt complaint, although my subscribers send images frequently, and audio and executables on an occasional basis. The other way to choose your subscribers is according to willingness to pay. If you're making a profit off them, you can afford to pay Danegeld. See also http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq03.042.htp The author of that FAQ was a founding member of AOL's postmaster team.
- References:
- [tlug] Making sure people get the message
- From: stephen
- Re: [tlug] Making sure people get the message
- From: Jim
- Re: [tlug] Making sure people get the message
- From: Dave M G
- Re: [tlug] Making sure people get the message
- From: Godwin Stewart
- Re: [tlug] Making sure people get the message
- From: stephen
- Re: [tlug] Making sure people get the message
- From: Dave M G
- Re: [tlug] Making sure people get the message
- From: Dave M G
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Making sure people get the message
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Making sure people get the message
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Making sure people get the message
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Making sure people get the message
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links