Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Good XML Parser
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:25:12 +0100
- From: "David Stibbe" <dstibbe@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Good XML Parser
- References: <e9e03b120612120242j56e01444oadef946a1a6296dc@example.com> <20061212124228.673aafde@example.com> <e9e03b120612120443m74bd372aqc1a6de3eab010a21@example.com> <87lklca787.fsf@example.com>
On 12/13/06, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen@example.com> wrote:
Are you sure you're using a native SAX implementation? The whole point of SAX is to avoid building a full DOM representation; that could take a long time and a lot of memory. If you're just using a SAX API wrapped around DOM, you are going to be slow.
Exactly the reason why I choose SAX and not DOM. I figured if I chose an API provided by a fairly trusted group (Apache) that I wouldn't get any strange surprises (wishful thinking, I know). I have no idea how Xerces implemented their SAX API though.
David
- References:
- [tlug] Good XML Parser
- From: David Stibbe
- Re: [tlug] Good XML Parser
- From: Botond Botyanszki
- Re: [tlug] Good XML Parser
- From: David Stibbe
- Re: [tlug] Good XML Parser
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] tv tuners question
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] tv tuners question
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Good XML Parser
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Good XML Parser
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links