Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Networking two Linux computers harder than Linux toWindows?
- Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:05:52 +0900
- From: Patrick Kellaher <kalmite@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Networking two Linux computers harder than Linux toWindows?
- References: <46149486.3040103@example.com> <877c5f0172dad5ccba68580282838145@example.com> <f118b8b90704050712v2f6d4817g237ee560c4df2016@example.com> <Pine.NEB.4.64.0704060843510.9645@example.com> <4620AB24.10200@example.com> <87tzvivo7c.fsf@example.com> <46216903.4000903@example.com>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070301)
Dave M G wrote:Stephen, Scott,
Thank you for responding.
Scott said:Or, have you looked in /etc/init.d to see if there is an nfs--or perhaps
nfs-kernel-server?
I did find nfs-kernel-server, so I ran that.
$ sudo sh /etc/init.d/nfs-kernel-server start
Password:
* Exporting directories for NFS kernel daemon... exportfs: /etc/exports [2]: Neither 'subtree_check' or 'no_subtree_check' specified for export "192.168.0.3:/home/fileserver".
Assuming default behaviour ('subtree_check').
NOTE: this default will change with nfs-utils version 1.1.0 [ OK ]
* Starting NFS kernel daemon [ OK ]
Those OK notes look encouraging.
The thing is, is there a command I should be running on the client? The notes I've seen seem to only talk about a server.
Stephen said:> 5. I then attempt to make a connection:Ages. As I'm writing this it's still waiting, and has been for a good ten minutes.
> $sudo mount 192.168.0.2:/home/fileserver /home/meg/daves_machine
> When I ran this last command, it didn't return to a command prompt,
This is bad, it should only take a couple of seconds to determine that
NFS server is or is not running. How long did you wait?
Stephen said:mount doesn't create directories. It attaches a filesystem to anAh. Thanks for clearing that up. I've now ensured that there is a directory for the mount command to attach the network share too.
existing directory.
Dave
So it appears that if I kept reading, then I wouldn't have needed to send off the last email. You shouldn't need to start any services on the client computer. If you add the filesystem into the /etc/fstab then you should be able to just issue the mount <mount point> command. If the entry is not in fstab then you would have to use:
mount -t nfs <server>:<server dir> <local mount point>
Pat
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Networking two Linux computers harder than Linux to Windows?
- From: Dave M G
- Re: [tlug] Networking two Linux computers harder than Linux toWindows?
- From: scott
- Re: [tlug] Networking two Linux computers harder than Linux toWindows?
- From: Keith Bawden
- Re: [tlug] Networking two Linux computers harder than Linux toWindows?
- From: Curt Sampson
- Re: [tlug] Networking two Linux computers harder than Linux toWindows?
- From: Dave M G
- Re: [tlug] Networking two Linux computers harder than Linux toWindows?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Networking two Linux computers harder than Linux toWindows?
- From: Dave M G
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Networking two Linux computers harder than Linux toWindows?
- Next by Date: [tlug] LPIC2 study guides?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Networking two Linux computers harder than Linux toWindows?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Networking two Linux computers harder than Linux toWindows? [SOLVED]
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links