Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Open archives are bad?
- Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 14:34:34 +0900
- From: Dave M G <martin@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Open archives are bad?
- References: <46298A72.1020007@example.com> <32a656c20704202224n4c5f556ajcaecce4888ed829a@example.com>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070403)
Uva,
Thanks for responding.I don't know exactly what you mean by "peer review", but I do know that this list has no better or worse a signal to noise ratio than any other technical mailing list that I've ever been on (and I've been on quite a few).It seems to me that we might be adding more noise than content without peer review.
Much of the knowledge base is time criticalThere's an interesting debate to be had there about whether or not all information used by humans is time critical, based on the perspective of the people using it.
But, esoterica aside, I think the damage done by some information, years old, falling out of date is far outweighed by information that is maybe only months old being found and used.
And you never know what information may be useful later. Five years from now a friend of yours might give you their 7 year old machine and you decide to install something on it...
-- Dave M G Ubuntu 7.04 Feisty Fawn Kernel 2.6.20-15-generic Pentium D Dual Core Processor
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Open archives are bad?
- From: Uva Coder
- References:
- [tlug] Open archives are bad?
- From: Dave M G
- Re: [tlug] Open archives are bad?
- From: Uva Coder
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Open archives are bad?
- Next by Date: [tlug] NFS versus boot order
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Open archives are bad?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Open archives are bad?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links