Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] [C&C] AAC is lossy, FLAC is lossless
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:45:41 +0900 (JST)
- From: Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] [C&C] AAC is lossy, FLAC is lossless
- References: <d8fcc0800707231552h1673496bo7518ddc7a863cfa9@mail.gmail.com> <ea4e853e0707240948m333f8c4em1efe3b20a3a11dff@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Lyle H Saxon wrote:
But I guess that's the joke then? That [the 8-track] was long-dead rusty non-functional technology from day-one when it was installed?
Not really. It's just a version of the standard radio "cart" (meaning cartridge tape) system used for commercials and suchlike for a long time until digital recording came in. The main difference was that the carts were stereo, with two tracks, and sometimes a very thin time-code track in the middle.
It's the usual case of a reasonable technology being pushed to its limits; the audio quality was quite fine until they reduced the speed and quartered the track width. But then again, who would want to buy one of those if they only held half a song? :-)
cjs -- Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com> +81 90 7737 2974 Mobile sites and software consulting: http://www.starling-software.com
- References:
- [tlug] [C&C] AAC is lossy, FLAC is lossless
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] [C&C] AAC is lossy, FLAC is lossless
- From: Lyle H Saxon
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] [C&C] AAC is lossy, FLAC is lossless
- Next by Date: RE: [C&C] The Advantage of 8-Track Tapes . . . . . (was: Re:[tlug][C&C] AAC is lossy, FLAC is lossless)
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] [C&C] AAC is lossy, FLAC is lossless
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] [C&C] AAC is lossy, FLAC is lossless
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links